Confirmed thefts 2024 to 2025
Up 18 percent
Roughly 2,243 to 2,646 confirmed events.
A distribution center loses freight two ways. Somebody breaks in at night, which is the risk everyone designs for, or somebody drives up during business hours with paperwork that looks legitimate and leaves with a full trailer. The second one is now the bigger number, and most camera systems were never designed to catch it.
That changes what we build. Gate and dock coverage gets treated as an identity and evidence function, with license plate recognition tied to the appointment schedule. Perimeter coverage gets behavior-based analytics rather than passive motion. Everything gets documented well enough to survive a shipper audit.
Confirmed thefts 2024 to 2025
Up 18 percent
Roughly 2,243 to 2,646 confirmed events.
Total loss value
Up 60 percent
Roughly 453 million to 725 million dollars.
Average loss per theft
273,990
Approximate dollars, up about 36 percent.
Dock camera density
1 per 2 to 4 doors
Depends on dock depth and door spacing.
Confirmed cargo thefts rose about 18 percent from 2024 to 2025, from roughly 2,243 to roughly 2,646 events. Total estimated loss value rose about 60 percent over the same period, from roughly 453 million dollars to roughly 725 million dollars. Average loss per theft rose about 36 percent to roughly 273,990 dollars.
Now the part most vendors skip. Incident counts have plateaued or slightly dipped into 2026, while value per theft and the sophistication of the theft have risen sharply. Anyone telling you cargo theft is simply up by some percentage is leaving out the only detail that should change your design.
Fewer, larger, smarter thefts point at a different countermeasure set than more, smaller, opportunistic ones. You are not defending against a person with bolt cutters. You are defending against a business that researched your dock schedule.
The dominant tactic is criminal networks impersonating legitimate carriers. They obtain carrier identity three ways: credential harvesting through phishing, remote access malware on a broker or carrier system, and purchasing legitimate motor carrier businesses outright to inherit clean authority and clean paperwork.
This is strategic theft and fictitious pickup. A driver arrives inside an appointment window with documents that reconcile, loads at an assigned door and drives away. There is no forced entry, no alarm, no glass break and no after-hours event. The loss is discovered when the real carrier shows up or the consignee calls.
The design conclusion follows directly. Your gate camera is not a deterrent, it is an identity verification and evidentiary instrument. It has to produce a face, a plate, a tractor and a trailer number that hold up weeks later when a claim is contested.
The rest of the design is conventional, and it should be, because the conventional parts are where investigations actually get resolved.
Camera coverage runs the dock face at roughly one camera per two to four doors depending on dock depth and door spacing, yard drive aisles, the fence line, trailer parking rows, pick and pack areas, the shipping office and the outbound staging cage. Overhead coverage of staging is where product substitution and short-loading get caught.
Access control covers the guard shack, the office to warehouse demising doors, the high-value cage, the main distribution frame and the driver lounge boundary. That last one matters more than people expect, because a driver lounge with an unlocked door into the warehouse is an open building.
Passive motion on a yard camera will alarm on tumbleweed, snow, headlights and a forklift. Once monitoring learns your alarms are noise, response degrades and the investment is wasted.
Use behavior rules instead. Line crossing on the fence line. Loitering in the trailer rows outside scheduled hours. Object left behind at a dock door. Person detected in a vehicle-only aisle after shift end. Add talk-down speakers so a monitoring operator can intervene rather than just log.
Third shift and weekends are where remote monitoring earns its cost. A yard with no staff between 10 p.m. and 5 a.m. does not need more recording, it needs somebody watching the rules fire.
Two standards come up constantly in this vertical, and it is worth being precise about their status.
TAPA Facility Security Requirements are a shipper-mandated standard, not a law. You comply because a customer contract requires it. TAPA does not require a specific camera brand or model, it requires demonstrated coverage, recording and access control against defined criteria.
CTPAT minimum security criteria are a US Customs and Border Protection program covering physical access control, video surveillance and alarms among other areas. It is voluntary, and participation carries real trade benefits, so the criteria function as requirements once you are in.
Beyond those, customer and shipper security audits and cargo insurance underwriting conditions drive most of the remaining scope. Underwriters increasingly ask specific questions about gate control and retention.
Treat the gate as an identity checkpoint. License plate recognition tied to the appointment and dock scheduling system, a driver identity camera at the shack at identification-grade detail, tractor and trailer number capture, and time-synchronized records so gate, dock and paperwork reconcile. Technology supports the process. The process is verifying the carrier against the booking before the trailer moves.
CTPAT minimum security criteria address physical access control, video surveillance and alarm systems as part of a broader program, without naming products. In practice that means documented coverage of shipping, receiving and cargo handling areas, controlled and logged access to those areas, recorded video retained on a defined schedule, and periodic verification that the system works.
Plan on roughly one camera per two to four dock doors, depending on dock depth, door spacing and mounting height. Shallow docks with tight door spacing allow wider coverage per camera. Add separate overhead coverage of outbound staging, because product substitution and short-loading are caught at staging rather than at the door.
No. TAPA Facility Security Requirements are shipper-mandated criteria rather than law, and they do not specify a brand or model. They require demonstrated coverage, recording, retention and access control that satisfy the class of certification your customer contract calls for. We design to the criteria and document it for the audit.
Continue through the school security cluster and related campus planning pages.
Commercial building security works best as one platform covering cameras, door access and alarms across every building you operate, so a facility manager investigates an incident in one interface instead of three. Confluence Security designs, installs and supports those systems across Colorado, Wyoming, Utah and New Mexico.
Explore Commercial buildingsA parking structure is usually the highest-liability area on a property, and it is also the hardest place to get a usable image because of low ceilings, columns, glare and poor lighting. Confluence Security designs parking and fleet yard coverage around those constraints, with plate recognition at entries and exits and detection analytics on unlit yards.
Explore Parking and fleet yardsIn critical infrastructure, the deliverable is as much the documentation as the hardware. Confluence Security designs physical security for substations, water and wastewater sites, telecom perimeters and remote unmanned locations, and produces the assessment and plan evidence an auditor expects to see.
Explore Critical infrastructure and utilitiesSend us a site plan with your dock count and gate layout. We will design gate identity capture, dock coverage and yard analytics against your audit requirements.
Kindly provide your contact info and a team member will get in touch shortly.