Anchor operator
Since 2012
Expansion announced in 2026, roughly 3,200 additional acres acquired.
The scale here is genuinely large relative to the state. A major hyperscale operator has been present since 2012, announced a further expansion in 2026 and acquired roughly 3,200 additional acres to triple its footprint. A second hyperscaler announced an 800 million dollar facility in 2024. A 302 megawatt campus broke ground in October 2025. Several colocation and compute operators sit alongside them.
Cumulative community tax contributions from data centers between 2012 and 2025 total roughly 111.8 million dollars. The city voted down a proposed pause on new data centers in 2026, and Cheyenne is seeing a broader building boom in business parks and hotels alongside the campuses.
Anchor operator
Since 2012
Expansion announced in 2026, roughly 3,200 additional acres acquired.
Second hyperscaler
800M dollars
Facility announced in 2024.
New campus
302 MW
Broke ground October 2025.
Community tax contribution
About 111.8M dollars
Cumulative from data centers, 2012 to 2025.
We are not going to tell you we will secure a hyperscale campus. Those operators run their own security programs with their own standards and their own staff. Saying otherwise would be a sales fiction and anyone in the industry would spot it.
The work is the ecosystem, and it is substantial because the builds run for years.
A staging yard during a data center build holds more valuable copper, switchgear and transformer material than most warehouses, on a site with a temporary fence, no permanent power, no network and a workforce that changes weekly. It is the highest-risk phase of the whole project and it is usually secured last.
The design that works is temporary by intent and permanent in quality: solar and cellular camera positions that move with the laydown areas, analytics for line crossing and loitering rather than passive motion so wind and wildlife do not bury the alerts, talk-down speakers so an operator can end a trespass without a police call, plate recognition at the single controlled gate, and remote monitoring on nights and weekends when the yard is empty.
The power infrastructure serving these campuses brings the strictest requirements in the local market. Where an asset is a specifically identified critical transmission station or substation, the NERC CIP physical security standard CIP-014 applies, requiring threat and vulnerability evaluation and a physical security plan with third-party review. That standard applies to identified assets rather than to every piece of equipment, and the utility determines the identification.
For that work the documentation is the deliverable as much as the hardware: assessment inputs, a physical security plan, evidence of remediation and an audit file that survives review.
Colocation and compute operators, and the contractors who serve them, work to a recognizable pattern. Knowing it matters even when the campus itself is not your customer, because their auditors set the expectation for everyone touching the site.
Written generally: locking arrangements affecting required exits are reviewed locally and the fire authority decides. On an active construction site, temporary systems still have to respect egress and temporary power rules. We handle that conversation and we do not override fire code egress to satisfy a lockdown request.
Pricing does not change much by city. Labor rates, lift work, conduit runs and permit time do. Treat every figure below as a budgeting range for scoping, not a quote.
Hardware is typically 20 to 35 percent of installed cost. Budget roughly 1,000 to 2,500 dollars per camera fully installed, more for pole mounts, parking structures, long conduit and lift work. Access control runs roughly 1,500 to 3,500 dollars per door installed for a card or fob system, and cloud access software is commonly 3.50 to 15 dollars per door per month.
In cloud video, retention period is the single largest cost lever, ahead of resolution, analytics and whether recording is continuous or event based. Decide retention as a policy question first and the budget follows.
Data center investment, acreage, megawatt and tax contribution figures reflect public announcements and reporting through 2026 and will change. Confirm current figures before citing them in a planning document.
No. Those operators largely self-perform their own security to their own standards. We work the ecosystem: construction staging yards, contractor offices, power infrastructure, workforce hotels and the business parks that follow. That is where the addressable work is and we would rather say so.
Solar-powered cellular camera positions that relocate as the laydown areas move, analytics for line crossing and loitering instead of passive motion, talk-down speakers, plate recognition at the one controlled gate, and remote monitoring on nights and weekends.
For specifically identified critical transmission stations and substations, threat and vulnerability evaluation and a physical security plan with third-party review. It applies to identified assets, not to every asset, and the utility determines identification. The documentation is a deliverable in its own right.
The city voted down a proposed pause on new data centers in 2026, and construction activity in business parks and hotels has continued alongside the campuses. Local policy can change, so confirm current status with the city before planning around it.
The drivers change with the geography. These are the differences worth knowing.
If you are building, staging or servicing a campus here, the yard is the exposure. Let us scope it before the material arrives.
Kindly provide your contact info and a team member will get in touch shortly.